Within the beginning sections of the publication Authentic, speaker the author poses a challenge: typical directives to “bring your true self” or “bring your full, authentic self to work” are not harmless encouragements for individuality – they’re traps. Burey’s debut book – a mix of memoir, investigation, societal analysis and discussions – seeks to unmask how organizations co-opt identity, shifting the burden of corporate reform on to employees who are already vulnerable.
The motivation for the book originates in part in Burey’s personal work history: various roles across retail corporations, emerging businesses and in worldwide progress, interpreted via her perspective as a Black disabled woman. The two-fold position that Burey faces – a tension between standing up for oneself and seeking protection – is the driving force of the book.
It emerges at a time of general weariness with institutional platitudes across the United States and internationally, as opposition to diversity and inclusion efforts grow, and various institutions are cutting back the very structures that earlier assured change and reform. Burey delves into that terrain to assert that backing away from authenticity rhetoric – namely, the business jargon that minimizes personal identity as a grouping of aesthetics, peculiarities and hobbies, leaving workers focused on managing how they are viewed rather than how they are treated – is not an effective response; instead, we need to redefine it on our individual conditions.
Via vivid anecdotes and interviews, Burey illustrates how marginalized workers – employees from diverse backgrounds, members of the LGBTQ+ community, female employees, disabled individuals – soon understand to modulate which identity will “fit in”. A vulnerability becomes a disadvantage and people try too hard by striving to seem agreeable. The effort of “bringing your full self” becomes a display surface on which numerous kinds of assumptions are projected: emotional labor, sharing personal information and continuous act of thankfulness. According to Burey, we are asked to reveal ourselves – but lacking the defenses or the reliance to withstand what emerges.
According to the author, employees are requested to expose ourselves – but without the defenses or the reliance to endure what arises.’
Burey demonstrates this phenomenon through the narrative of a worker, a deaf employee who chose to inform his co-workers about deaf community norms and communication norms. His willingness to talk about his life – a gesture of candor the organization often commends as “genuineness” – temporarily made everyday communications more manageable. But as Burey shows, that improvement was precarious. After employee changes wiped out the informal knowledge the employee had developed, the environment of accessibility dissolved with it. “All of that knowledge went away with the staff,” he comments exhaustedly. What remained was the exhaustion of needing to begin again, of being made responsible for an organization’s educational process. From the author’s perspective, this demonstrates to be asked to reveal oneself without protection: to face exposure in a system that praises your honesty but refuses to formalize it into policy. Sincerity becomes a snare when companies depend on employee revelation rather than institutional answerability.
Burey’s writing is both lucid and expressive. She blends scholarly depth with a style of connection: a call for audience to lean in, to question, to dissent. According to the author, dissent at work is not noisy protest but ethical rejection – the practice of opposing uniformity in environments that expect appreciation for mere inclusion. To dissent, according to her view, is to challenge the narratives companies tell about fairness and acceptance, and to decline participation in practices that perpetuate inequity. It could involve identifying prejudice in a gathering, opting out of voluntary “equity” work, or establishing limits around how much of oneself is made available to the institution. Resistance, she suggests, is an assertion of individual worth in environments that frequently encourage compliance. It constitutes a practice of principle rather than opposition, a way of asserting that a person’s dignity is not conditional on institutional approval.
The author also avoids rigid dichotomies. The book does not simply eliminate “authenticity” wholesale: rather, she calls for its restoration. According to the author, sincerity is not the raw display of personality that business environment typically applauds, but a more deliberate correspondence between one’s values and one’s actions – an integrity that resists distortion by corporate expectations. As opposed to considering genuineness as a mandate to reveal too much or conform to sterilized models of transparency, the author encourages audience to keep the aspects of it based on honesty, individual consciousness and moral understanding. According to Burey, the aim is not to abandon genuineness but to relocate it – to remove it from the executive theatrical customs and toward connections and offices where confidence, fairness and answerability make {
A passionate writer and shopping enthusiast with a keen eye for quality products and lifestyle trends.
Brian Hernandez
Brian Hernandez
Brian Hernandez