Not in Australia's most optimistic hopes could they have believed they would be leading two-nil in this historic rivalry after playing only six days of cricket.
They were placed under severe pressure by England during the opener at the WACA, before executing a remarkable reversal.
This propelled them riding a crest of self-belief heading into the Brisbane encounter, where they gave England a lesson in how to play Test cricket, especially day-night Test cricket.
The contest remains alive, however, it's not far from it. Should England don't win the third Test, it will get deeply humiliating.
I gained an intimate view at England's style during the 2023 Ashes in the UK. For all of the talk about this tour being their chance to ultimately secure a victory in Australia, existed a lot of doubt in this country about the way England play.
Would England's batting be suited to Australian conditions? Would they attempt aggressive strokes and discover methods to get out? Might they collapse under the pressure during crucial phases?
Right now, all of the Australians who were sceptical regarding England are seeing their views validated.
There exists a lot I admire about England's attitude. I appreciate it when sportspeople compete fearlessly, as this enables them push the limits of what is possible.
But I don't like the notion that pressure or high expectations should be eliminated. The great players thrive under pressure, and the best teams hold each other to account.
"Indeed, there existed the coaches such as Simpson and Buchanan, however, it was the captain and senior players who invariably managed the team environment."
Even when a newcomer, I believed I had permission to have my say. Everyone took responsibility of the team.
Subsequently, should someone stepped out of line, they faced consequences by the other players. If someone made an error repeatedly - an uncommon occurrence very often - they were addressed.
Our team contained some huge personalities - none bigger than the great Shane Warne - but we all felt that our actions served the team and our comrades. Matthew Hayden used to say we pulled together due to the affection we had for each other, such was the duration we had as a group.
That sense of duty, responsibility and adaptability all came together when we stepped on to the field as a team.
Certainly, these factors are easier while a side is winning, a scenario England are not doing at this moment.
My concern for England stemmed from the philosophy of a rigid style yielded a culture deficient in personal responsibility.
It seemed that England had decided pitches must conform to them, instead of England adapting their game to the prevailing conditions.
Finally, following the result of the loss in Brisbane, it looks like realisation has dawned.
Both Ben Stokes and coach Brendon McCullum acknowledged there are issues, and they need to do something about it.
I have no problems with the statements the English leadership said in public at the Gabba. If Stokes and McCullum have been forthright in the media, you can guarantee they have been forceful behind closed doors.
Will we now see a new version of Bazball? Like I said, I support the aspect of playing fearlessly. If England can add the ingredients of pressure and accountability, then they may still possess to something.
For all that England have faced criticism, Australia deserve significant credit of credit.
Had England been informed they would face an Australian side without all of Pat Cummins, Hazlewood and Lyon, they would have been delighted with anticipation.
And yet, Australia pulled off a win in Brisbane with all of their other players standing up.
Pacer Mitchell Starc has proven exceptionally brilliant, ably assisted by Michael Neser, Boland and Doggett.
Wicketkeeper Alex Carey delivered an absolute masterclass with the gloves, possibly the best wicketkeeping performance I have witnessed - and I shared a dressing room with Ian Healy and Adam Gilchrist.
Maybe the most significant revelation from an Australian perspective has been the shift within the top order.
Prior to the contest, when there seemed there was considerable debate regarding Australia's lineup, I stated there was only really one question concerning one position - Usman Khawaja's batting partner.
That debate is now resolved, simply not in the manner anyone predicted.
Ever since Batsman Travis Head stuck his hand up to open when Khawaja got hurt in Perth, Australia has appeared transformed. Now, it appears there is a chance for Head and Jake Weatherald to establish themselves as the first-wicket duo.
Khawaja could face difficulty to get back in, although Australia coach Andrew McDonald has suggested he might feature in the middle order.
Injuries will mean English speedster Mark Wood and Australian seamer Josh Hazlewood being absent for the Adelaide Test and the rest of the series.
That is a great shame for both men. I know the immense effort required to bowl quickly, the effort involved in recovering from setbacks, and how desperate both players were to participate fully in this contest. They are surely devastated.
The Adelaide Oval will provide a quality surface, with something in it for batsmen and bowlers. Australia will undoubtedly recall Lyon and it looks like Cummins will be back to captain the side.
Australia recalls how England recovered from 2-0 down to level the previous series. They will know England poses a threat.
On this occasion, they hold England by the throat and must not let up merely because some big names are coming back. They cannot becoming overconfident.
An Australia team should always think it is capable of winning every Test it contests, so for that reason this squad should be thinking about winning five-nil whitewash.
England understands they are compelled to reverse their fortunes at Adelaide. If they don't, then it really could be a 5-0 series defeat.
A passionate writer and shopping enthusiast with a keen eye for quality products and lifestyle trends.
Brian Hernandez